The Randy Stakes

comments Comments Off
By , 7/13/2004 9:29 am

Gordon Edes reports today that Randy Johnson is in fact open to a trade and has not ruled Boston out, as was reported last week.

Reports say that he is open to playing for Anaheim, Boston or New York and I would have to think that if landing Johnson will be a matter of who offers the most young talent, then that is precisely the order of his most likely destinations.

Anaheim has a bevy of minor league talent. Corner infielders Casey Kotchman and Dallas McPherson represent their most promising position player chips while hurlers Bobby Jenks and Ervin Sanatana would also have to tempt the Snakes.

Boston has a few chips of note. Catcher Kelly Shoppach and rookie thirdbaseman Kevin Youkilis are probably the best of the bunch. Pitchers Abe Alvarez and Jon Lester and perhaps even young shortstop Hanley Ramirez all may help to seal the deal for the Sox as well.

The Yankees have very little to offer. Dioneer Navarro is a promising catcher but the list of attractive commodities in the Yanks’ system basically starts and ends with Navarro. Of course you never rule the Yanks out simply because they can always outspend whomever they would like if cash should become a consideration.

So the possibilities based on reports we have now break down like this as far as I see it. If it is simply talent the D-Backs want, the Halos are the front-runners. If it is money they want, or salary relief, the Yanks jump to the fore. If a combination of talent and money is what Arizona seeks, I would think that would benefit the Sox, MLB’s #2 spending team with a few prospects of significance.

Stay tuned, people.

Sully’s Awards

comments Comments Off
By , 7/12/2004 4:19 pm

I’ll bite…

AL MVP

Manny Ramirez
Vladimir Guererro
Ivan Rodriguez
Melvin Mora
Carlos Guillen
Hank Blalock
David Ortiz
Alex Rodriguez
Frank Thomas
Michael Young

NL MVP

Barry Bonds
Scott Rolen
JD Drew
Todd Helton
Bob Abreu
Jim Thome
Ben Sheets
Lance Berkman
Albert Pujols
Jason Schmidt

AL Cy Young

Curt Schilling
Mark Mulder
Johan Santana
Freddy Garcia
Tim Hudson

NL Cy Young

Ben Sheets
Jason Schmidt
Carlos Zambrano
Roger Clemens
Tom Glavine

AL Rookie

Daniel Cabrera
Bobby Crosby
Kevin Youkilis

NL Rookie

Ryan Madson
Akinori Otsuka
Jason Bay

AL Manager

Buck Showalter
Alan Trammell
Lou Piniella

NL Manager

Ned Yost
Jim Tracy
Bruce Bochy

Jeff’s Midyear Awards

comments Comments Off
By ,

I hope Sully posts his.

AL MVP – Manny Ramirez
2. Vlad Guerrero
3. Ivan Rodriguez
4. Frank Thomas
5. David Ortiz
6. Carlos Guillen
7. Jorge Posada
8. Hank Blalock
9. Michael Young
10. Mark Mulder

NL MVP – Barry Bonds
2. JD Drew
3. Todd Helton
4. Bobby Abreu
5. Scott Rolen
6. Jim Thome
7. Lance Berkman
8. Albert Pujols
9. Sean Casey
10. Mike Lowell

AL Cy Young – Mark Mulder
2. Curt Schilling
3. Brad Radke
4. Kenny Rogers
5. Johan Santana

NL Cy Young – Jason Schmidt
2. Randy Johnson
3. Carl Pavano
4. Roger Clemens
5. Tom Glavine

AL Rookie of the Year – Bobby Crosby
2. Kevin Youkilis
3. Daniel Cabrera

NL Rookie of the Year – Ryan Madison
2. Jason Bay
3. Akinori Otsuka

AL Manager of the Year – Lou Piniella
2. Mike Scioscia
3. Buck Showalter

NL Manager of the year – Jim Tracy
2. Dave Miley
3. Art Howe

Red Sox MVP – Manny Ramirez
Biggest surprise – Mark Bellhorn/Johnny Damon
Biggest disappointment – Byung-hyun Kim/Derek Lowe
Offensive Grade – B
Rotation Grade – B+ (would be an A if not for Lowe)
Bullpen Grade – B
Francona Grade – B-
Front Office Grade – C+

Jayson Stark Is At it Again

comments Comments Off
By ,

He has a column today naming the recipients of his midseason awards and he has decided that Scott Rolen has been the National League’s MVP thus far in 2004. Bear in mind that this is the same fellow that decided Shannon Stewart was the American League’s MVP for 2003. So here are Rolen’s and Bonds’ respective numbers this season:

Bonds: .365/.628/.794
Rolen: .339/.415/.599

It’s just not even remotely close. And the thing that sucks is that I am going to have to listen to the guy in my office that likes to regurgitate ESPN’s analysis (ahem, nonsense) tell me that Rolen plays every game like a bulldog and that Barry Bonds does steroids anyway.

Ineptitude, thy name is Jayson.

Edit: The USS Mariner took note as well.

Bull-Pucky

comments Comments Off
By , 7/11/2004 5:22 pm

It’s become sporting, when your team loses and there happens to be some poor umpiring, to remind fellow fans that “the umps didn’t lose that game”.

Screw that.

In the ninth inning with the Red Sox trailing by a run, Pokey Reese was called out at first after a pick-off attempt by Texas closer Francisco Cordero arrived a tad too late. Replays confirmed that Reese was indeed safe. Mark Bellhorn was then called out on a strike a good 8 inches low and a foot outside to end the game with Johnny Damon, the potential tying run, 90 feet away.

The umpires were not the only reason the Sox lost. Keith Foulke stunk and Terry Francona probably hung with Wakefield too long. But the fact is that the Sox made just one out in the ninth inning and still managed to get the game-tying run 90 feet away. No, they were no the only reason but they were the chief one.

Red Sox 14, Rangers 6

comments Comments Off
By ,

While walls were falling down around them just last Sunday, the Boston Red Sox are now being confused for the 1927 Yankees. Nah, the Boston press isn’t too fickle. Of course anyone worth their analytical salt could see that this Red Sox team was a very good one. As All-Baseball‘s weekly list will remind, for almost all of 2004 the Red Sox have had the Major’s most impressive total-bases-plus-walks differential. It was a matter of time before the wins started to come more frequently. Well they have.

Manny Ramirez and the Red Sox knocked around Rangers starter Kenny Rogers last night, even after Rogers’ teammates staked him to an early lead. The top of the Boston order was remarkable despite missing David Ortiz, who did not play after the birth of his third child earlier in the day. Johnny Damon brought down the house once again with another memorable performance cast as the ideal leadoff hitter. Mark Bellhorn and Nomar Garciaparra each had four hits, three runs, three RBI’s and one walk. And Ramirez hit home runs number 25 and 26 off of Kenny Rogers and, of all people, John “Way-Back” Wasdin.

Derek Lowe pitched pretty well. He gave up just four hits and three walks and struck out five in seven innings of work but was victimized by some shaky defense. Not one of the six runs Texas scored in the second inning was earned.

Today the Red Sox look to close out their second consecutive sweep. Tim Wakefield will face Ryan Drese in both teams’ final contests before the Mid-Summer Classic in Houston.

The Saviour

comments Comments Off
By , 7/10/2004 1:08 am

Johnny Damon and Bronson Arroyo led the way for the Sox tonight as they pounded the Texas Rangers 7-0.

Damon smacked two home runs and Arroyo pitched 8 strong innings, striking out seven and yielding just three hits to a Texas team that has been pounding the ball of late.

It appears as though the Sox may be turning a corner of sorts. Now if they can just get Derek Lowe to join them around the bend, all might be right again in the Nation.

We will see tomorrow.

Texas @ Boston

comments Comments Off
By , 7/9/2004 5:15 pm

Offense
c – Rod Barajas 270/290/546 (4.8 RC/27)
Jason Varitek 272/377/429 (4.8 RC/27)

1b – Mark Teixeira 278/374/556 (6.8 RC/27)
Kevin Millar 283/360/408 (4.5 RC/27)

2b – Alfonso Soriano 289/329/461 (4.6 RC/27)
Mark Bellhorn 262/384/429 (6.2 RC/27)

3b – Hank Blalock 308/372/575 (7.0 RC/27)
Bill Mueller 287/358/449 (5.7 RC/27)

ss – Michael Young 335/376/508 (7.0 RC/27)
Nomar Garciaparra 287/327/468 (5.3 RC/27)

lf – Dave Delucci 284/361/497 (6.0 RC/27)
Manny Ramirez 338/435/662 (8.7 RC/27)

cf – Gary Matthews Jr 288/353/466 (6.7 RC/27)
Johnny Damon 312/397/457 (6.6 RC/27)

rf – Kevin Mench 280/325/528 (5.0 RC/27)
Trot Nixon 241/313/467 (2.8 RC/27)

dh – Brad Fullmer 242/315/463 (3.8 RC/27)
David Ortiz 301/351/601 (7.2 RC/27)

Texas – 281/341/479 (5.1 RC/game)
Red Sox – 278/358/460 (5.5 RC/game)

Offensive Efficiency:
Texas – 100.3%
Boston – 97.3%

‘Clutch number’
Texas – (-0.020)
Boston – (-12.389)

Stolen Bases
Texas – (-36.1 BG) 57%
Boston – (-10.7 BG) 67%

BG is Net Bases Gained, based on the assumption that a player must steal at 73% to add runs to the offense.

Sacrifices
Texas – 1.69 per 550 PA
Boston – 1.31 per 550 PA

Pitching
Friday – Benoit (4.636) vs. Arroyo (13.139)
Saturday – Rogers (36.290) vs. Lowe (-0.191)
Sunday – Drese (28.674) vs. Wakefield (20.480)

Rotations
Texas – 87.196
Boston – 103.299

Bullpens
Texas – 77.813
Boston – 66.641

Usage
Texas – 2.7 RpG, 1.14 IPpAPP
Boston – 2.6 RpG, 1.09 IPpAPP

Best 4 Bullpen-
Rangers
Cordero – 17.567
Almanzar – 13.353
Mahay – 12.891
Shouse – 8.249

Red Sox
Foulke – 23.016
Timlin – 12.239
Williamson – 11.452
Embree – 5.567

Train Roll On…

comments Comments Off
By ,

I think I would have preferred a boring win in which Schilling remained dominant and the bullpen held up better. But what the hell? If there are two areas we as Sox fans have nothing to bitch about in 2004, it is the pitching of both Curt Schilling and the bullpen. So savor one hell of an exciting win.

Back with more at some point I hope.

Oh and that guy’s right. Jeff’s a helluva lot more interesting than I.

Boston 8, Oakland 7

comments Comments Off
By , 7/8/2004 11:18 pm

This is an e-mail I recieved this last week:


Jeff-

I really enjoy your site, and I love the point of view you and Patrick express. Please don’t take this as criticism, but I’ve noticed a disctinct difference in style between you two. Patrick seems to be a more straight forward and organized. You seem to be more interesting, but are much harder to read. You guys would be great if you could combine into one.

Good luck,
Jim

I don’t know if that’s true or not. Could Sully be the more understated superego to my prone-to-say-motherfucker-a-lot id?

This got me thinking about the Red Sox. Could it be they suffer from the same psychosis as Jim seems to think?

In this game, the Sox had a blow out, lost the lead, and stole a win with speed. This after two blowouts. And getting blown out. They swept the A’s, got swept by the Yankees.

The whole post to this point has been made to confuse Jim.

Much like the Red Sox have confused me…hmmmm. Maybe we’re on to something here…

Ranger preview tomorrow, and a rant forthcoming on why I like to use All Star ballots paper airplanes.

Oh yeah. Johnny Damon is fast. Much faster now then when he was wearing sandles and carpentering.

.351 / .441 / .543

comments Comments Off
By ,

That’s what the Red Sox have hit as a team vs. Oakland Athletics pitching.

Oakland’s overall opponents’ batting line is .270/.336/.413.

That’s all.

Red Sox 11, A’s 3

comments Comments Off
By ,

22-3

That’s what the Boston Red Sox have done to the Oakland Athletics the last two nights.

Last night at Fenway, Pedro Martinez pitched exactly the way you would hope your ace would with a sizeable lead – quickly and accurately. He could have been sharper but it didn’t matter. It was a solid effort, one in which both Pedro’s tempo and his eagerness to throw each successive pitch indicated that the confidence (aw hell, arrogance) for which he has become so famous may very much be back.

Offensively, it was Oakland lefty Mark Redman this time who could not contain an unremitting Red Sox attack. Every starter except David Ortiz had a hit. Mark Bellhorn hit a laser over the Green Monster. Nomar flaunted his hot bat once again with a shot to straightaway centerfield. And Manny – dear Lord. He hit perhaps 2004′s longest home run at Fenway off of Oakland reliever Chad Bradford in the seventh inning. It appeared still to be rising when it glanced off one of the Coke bottles that adorn the left field light towers. It was an emphatic exclamation point on what had been a second straight offensive outpouring.

There was much more to the offense than just the home runs, of course. The 6 through 9 spots in the Boston order were 8-14 and on base 10-16. Bill Mueller collected another three hits and Jason Varitek showed signs that he may be breaking out of his extended slump with a couple of hits of his own.

Interestingly, at the end of the game Terry Francona seemed to manage it as if it were far closer than it was. I think I liked it. Because the Red Sox have seemed to lose or blow teams out since about mid-June or so, there have been few opportunities for the type of blue-print victories Sox fans grew accustomed to in early April – starter for six or seven, steady middle relief for an inning or two and Foulke slams the door. So Francona lifted Pedro for Alan Embree to start the eighth. He then pulled Embree after he faced just two batters and Mike Timlin finished the inning before turning it over to Keith Foulke to close out an 8-run lead in the ninth.

Ed Cossette has a nice personal anecdote about last night’s game and Dirt Dogs has a mighty interesting rumor about a certain lanky southpaw currently hurling in the desert.

Oakland’s magnificent but raw talent Rich Harden faces Boston’s potential All-Star starter Curt Schilling this evening.

Red Sox 11, A’s 0

comments Comments Off
By , 7/7/2004 10:28 am

Jerry Remy wouldn’t stop reminding the NESN television audience that Barry Zito’s curveball, when on, is baseball’s best. I am inclined to agree I guess but I was wondering, “what happened to Barry Zito”? I began to develop a bit of a theory as to why Zito has lost effectiveness. Much has been made, at least in the statistical community, of his declining K-rates:

K/9

2001: 8.61
2002: 7.14
2003: 5.67
2004: 6.93

Still, his strikeout rate has improved this year and yet his numbers are way up. David Pinto correctly notes that his GB/FB ratio is down. This is often symptomatic of a pitcher getting hit harder – something certainly happening to Zito in 2004. It seems to me that from 2000-2002, Zito got by with pinpoint location on his fastball and a devastating, big-breaking curveball. Sure he had been mixing in a change-up here and there over that time but not with the propensity he has the last year and a half or so. I believe it is because, with just two pitches, hitters learned to adjust over time. This trend has necessitated the rushed development of his change and he simply does not yet have the command over the change that he does his other pitches.

This was on full display last night. The Sox were able to wait Zito out, watching his curveball miss the zone and his change-up miss badly as they sat on what really is a pretty ordinary fastball that Zito features. Throwing 87 MPH with one good breaking pitch and one bad one is no formula for Major League Baseball pitching success.

Of course Zito’s opponent last night, Tim Wakefield, essentially features just one pitch (strikeout of Jermaine Dye on a fastball notwithstanding). But when said pitch is a knuckleball, you might as well have 75 pitches because rarely does the knuckleball move in the same manner. Wakefield was magnificent last night. In command throughout, he yielded just 3 hits and a walk over 7 innings. He also struck out 6.

The Red Sox offensive attack was thorough and relentles. They banged out 17 hits and perhaps most encouraging of all was the fact that in the two innings they loaded the bases with nobody out, they did what most teams do in these situations – like…um…score some runs.

Bill Mueller, professional hitter, started the offensive attack with a three-run second inning home run. Mark Bellhorn had a nice game. Nomar chipped in with a couple of singles and a couple of RBI. Doug Mirabelli had 2 hits and 3 runs. But the undisputed offensive star of the night was centerfielder Johnny Damon, who collected 5 hits in his first 5 at-bats and had the crowd on his feet when he came up with a chance for his sixth hit of the night. I think it is time Damon received some recognition for the season he is having thus far.

I was convinced 2000 was a fluke. He had been pretty good in 1999 but since 2000, Damon really had not even approached his 2000 totals. Until this year, that is.

2000: .327/.382/.495
2001-2003: .271/.341/.403
2004: .307/.395/.457

With Carlos Beltran now playing in Houston, Damon is easily the American League’s best centerfielder. The top of the order igniter Royals fans witnessed around the turn of the century has managed to resurrect himself. The best news of all? Damon has been a notorious slow starter throughout the course of his career so it would be entirely reasonable to expect continued excellence from Damon.

With Damon and Mueller bookends in the lineup last night, signs of what this offensive attack can be started to show. From the clean effort from Wakefield, to a healthy lineup top to bottom, to Manny and Ortiz struggling in a Sox rout, to a big night from Kevin Millar, to the timely hitting with runners on, everything about last night just felt different.

Now let’s keep it going. Pedro and Redman tonight.

A-Wake-ning

comments Comments Off
By , 7/6/2004 10:55 pm

Let me offer up a little disclaimer before I go on. If there is one lesson to be learned from the 2004 Boston Red Sox thus far, it is that one ought to be careful not to confuse a blowout victory with a full-blown righting of the ship.

That said, what a night. Wake was awesome. Damon was awesome. Nomar was awesome. Mueller was awesome. Bellhorn and Mirabelli chipped in. It was a thorough and relentless offensive attack to go along with a masterful pitching performance. It was easily the season’s most complete effort by the Sox.

I am strapped for time at the moment but will try and get a full recap up in the morning. I watched the game closely and took fairly extensive notes.

Home Sweet Home

comments Comments Off
By ,

I hope folks take the high road and encourage the old town team at Fenway tonight. It’s been a frustrating three weeks or so, and a particularly galling six days, but kicking and screaming and whining accomplishes little. There is quite a bit of baseball remaining.

For the panic-stricken I would point out that on this day in 2002, the Oakland Athletics stood at 49-38, a full 4.5 games back of the Red Sox (6 in the loss column) for the American League Wild Card. By September 6th, Oakland was 88-52 and the Red Sox were actually 7 games behind them.

Things can change quickly, and for talented teams scuffling a bit, they often do.

Let’s hope Fenway’s familiarity and warmth provide comfort for a team desperately seeking to hit its stride.

Oakland @ Boston

comments Comments Off
By ,

Offense
c – Damian Miller 294/350/472 (5.3 RC/27)
Jason Varitek 272/378/431 (4.9 RC/27)

1b – Scott Hatteberg 304/384/474 (7.6 RC/27)
Kevin Millar 268/346/387 (4.1 RC/27)

2b – Mario Scutaro 265/292/358 (3.2 RC/27)
Mark Bellhorn 259/382/421 (6.2 RC/27)

3b – Mark McLemore 270/381/320 (5.1 RC/27)
Bill Mueller 263/329/404 (4.6 RC/27)

ss – Bobby Crosby 273/331/471 (4.5 RC/27)
Nomar Garciaparra 284/322/444 (5.2 RC/27)

lf – Eric Byrnes 287/353/487 (5.9 RC/27)
Manny Ramirez 340/436/656 (8.9 RC/27)

cf – Mark Kotsay 307/363/408 (5.3 RC/27)
Johnny Damon 296/388/450 (6.3 RC/27)

rf – Jermaine Dye 295/353/526 (5.6 RC/27)
Trot Nixon 240/316/460 (2.8 RC/27)

dh – Eurbial Durazo 315/389/500 (6.9 RC/27)
David Ortiz 306/359/609 (7.8 RC/27)

Oakland – 273/341/437 (4.9 RC/game)
Red Sox – 273/354/453 (5.3 RC/game)

Offensive Efficiency:
Oakland – 94.9%
Boston – 96.8%

‘Clutch number’
Oakland – 5.252
Boston – (-11.397)

Stolen Bases
Oakland – (-4.0 BG) 70%
Boston – (-11.7 BG) 66%

BG is Net Bases Gained, based on the assumption that a player must steal at 73% to add runs to the offense.

Sacrifices
Oakland – 1.21 per 550 PA
Boston – 1.37 per 550 PA

Pitching
Tuesday – Zito (16.438) vs Wakefield (15.810)
Wednesday – Redman (15.911) vs Martinez (27.818)
Thursday – Harden (17.713) vs Arroyo (13.139)

Rotations
Oakland – 129.240
Boston – 95.403

Bullpens
Oakland – 28.273
Boston – 66.415

Usage
Oakland – 2.3 RpG, 1.10 IPpAPP
Boston – 2.6 RpG, 1.09 IPpAPP

Best 4 Bullpen-
A’s
Duchscherer – 14.320
Bradford – 3.994
Hammonds – 3.886
Rhodes – 1.977

Red Sox
Foulke – 22.238
Timlin – 13.905
Williamson – 11.452
DiNardo – 5.455

Launch of Blair Wasdin

comments Comments Off
By , 7/3/2004 1:59 pm

I haven’t been writing much for one reason.

Disenfranchised with the quality of baseball discussion on this here internet, three people and myself started a new Red Sox/baseball message board.

The board is a screened membership, and the focus will be on intellegent, well-rationed baseball discussion, with a Boston bias. The link?

Blair Wasdin Project

Feel free to sign up.

Atlanta 6, Boston 3

comments Comments Off
By ,

Do you know what sucks worse than losing a game on a Nick Green walk off home run?

Saying how bad Green is right before the home run is hit.

Baseball sucks sometimes.

Boston @ Atlanta

comments Comments Off
By , 7/2/2004 2:49 pm

Offense
c – Johnny Estrada 335/389/489 (8.9 RC/27)
Jason Varitek 274/384/439 (5.3 RC/27)

1b – Julio Franco 281/358/431 (6.0 RC/27)
David Ortiz 311/363/612 (8.0 RC/27)

2b – Nick Green 287/348/396 (5.5 RC/27)
Mark Bellhorn 255/379/418 (6.0 RC/27)

3b – Chipper Jones 212/329/413 (4.9 RC/27)
Bill Mueller 262/333/414 (4.6 RC/27)

ss – Rafeal Furcal 258/335/391 (4.2 RC/27)
Nomar Garciaparra 235/274/382 (4.3 RC/27)

lf – Charles Thomas 350/381/550 (8.6 RC/27)
Manny Ramirez 340/436/663 (8.8 RC/27)

cf – Andruw Jones 251/341/477 (3.9 RC/27)
Johnny Damon 291/385/442 (6.1 RC/27)

rf – JD Drew 294/425/608 (8.5 RC/27)
Trot Nixon 275/362/550 (4.8 RC/27)

Atlanta – 258/326/417 (4.6 RC/game)
Red Sox – 273/355/455 (5.3 RC/game)

Offensive Efficiency:
Atlanta – 99.8%
Boston – 96.8%

‘Clutch number’
Atlanta – (-1.018)
Boston – (-9.853)

Stolen Bases
Atlanta – (-26.4 BG) 57%
Boston – (-10.1 BG) 67%

BG is Net Bases Gained, based on the assumption that a player must steal at 73% to add runs to the offense.

Sacrifices
Atlanta – 6.71 per 550 PA
Boston – 1.24 per 550 PA

Pitching
Friday – Arroyo (10.299) vs. Wright (15.631)
Saturday – Schilling (33.440) vs. Thomson (7.434)
Sunday – Lowe (4.474) vs. Hampton (-1.369)

Rotations
Atlanta – 66.566
Boston – 90.477

Bullpens
Atlanta – 36.683
Boston – 64.573

Usage
Atlanta – 2.7 RpG, 1.08 IPpAPP
Boston – 2.6 RpG, 1.08 IPpAPP

Best 4 Bullpen-
Braves
Smoltz – 10.012
Alfonseca – 9.814
Reitsma – 8.415
Cruz – 6.812

Red Sox
Foulke – 22.347
Timlin – 13.009
Williamson – 11.335
DiNardo – 4.202

Some Stuff to Kick Around

comments Comments Off
By ,

Situational OPS

Overall
BOS: .810
NYY: .807

None On
BOS: .826
NYY: .775

Runners On
BOS: .793
NYY: .845

RISP
BOS: .815
NYY: .867

Scoring Position, 2 Out
BOS: .766
NYY: .706

Bases Loaded
BOS: .646
NYY: .633

Close and Late
BOS: .766
NYY: .843

Opponent’s Situational OPS

Overall
BOS: .711
NYY: .735

None On
BOS: .685
NYY: .728

Runners On
BOS: .741
NYY: .743

RISP
BOS: .728
NYY: .730

Scoring Position, 2 out
BOS: .707
NYY: .582

Bases Loaded
BOS: .727
NYY: .628

Close and Late
BOS: .655
NYY: .618

These numbers tell the story. Folks wonder how the Yanks can be so far ahead of the Sox when their run differentials are so similar. Offensively, look at the Yanks’ big advantage with Runners On, Runners In Scoring Position and Close and Late. There are those that would say, “obviously, they are just more clutch”. But then I would point out that the Yanks have been dreadful both with the Bases Loaded and with Runners in Scoring Position and 2 outs. So where do their magical clutch powers go in those particular situations? There are similar advantages and inconsistencies on the pitching side of things, too. These numbers are indicative of nothing more than mere happenstance and they do not result from some wonderful chemical concoction Joe Torre whips together in the Bomber clubhouse. There is a lot of evening out to do over the next few months but I think the deficit is probably too large to overcome.

Or is it?

The Yanks’ third order win-loss, according to BP’s adjusted standings, has them at 46-30. If you apply this win percentage to their final 86 games, they would end up with 102 wins. The Red Sox’s third order win-loss is 48-29 and if you apply this percentage to their remaining 85 games, they would end up with 95 wins. So it would be a seven game deficit at year’s end if the Sox and Yanks continued to play as they have. But wait. Can’t we reasonably expect…

a) Trot and Nomar (or whatever Nomar fetches) to improve the overall offensive output?
b) Pedro and Lowe’s performances to improve?
c) A trade to upgrade the rotation?

So say the Sox can improve by two theoretical wins over 85 games. Now it’s a 5 game differential.

Now what if they also were to have some luck on their side – improve their performance with runners on base both on offense and defense? And what if the Yanks’ luck changed for the worse? I mean, if the Sox can under-perform their third-order win-loss by 6 games to this point, why can’t they outperform it by that same margin down the stretch?

I write this all to illustrate the roll luck plays in all of this. The two teams are close in talent and I am not giving up hope on the division.

Now, as I wrote in my last post, time to forget all about the Yanks.

On to Atlanta.

Panorama theme by Themocracy