Comments on: Keeping up with the Cabreras: A-Rod vs. Fat Miguel

By: Will

Will — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:04:38 +0000

It seems that they are talking 3 years, and I agree that 3 years should be the limit – I’d prefer 2 years with a team-option 3rd. But that’s a pipe dream.

Also Lowell has to recognize that he benefits offensively from playing at Fenway.

.373 .418 .575 .993 @ fenway.
.276 .339 .428 .767 on the road.

By: Bdizzle

Bdizzle — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:38:49 +0000

I’m completly at a loss how anyone can make an argument that at 34 Lowell is past his prime. I think his numbers over the past two years speak for themsleves.

But maybe you all are right, maybe a clubhouse cancer like Mr. April would be better for 10 years and over 300 million. Or maybe an overpriced fatty with no fielding skills. Or maybe i’m just crazy. This blog is losing credibilty faster than Ms. Spears with ridiculous postings like these. Whatever happened to Zach eating shit for being so CLEARLY wrong on Lowell for th past two years?

If it ain’t broke, then don’t fix it, and 3rd base ain’t broke!

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:42:39 +0000

Anything over 3 years for Lowell is WAY too much. And 3 years is pushing it.

By: Bdizzle

Bdizzle — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:08:42 +0000

You were wrong about Lowell in the past two years, and apparently you will continue to be wrong about Lowell. I only hope that the Yankees don’t sign him, cause that would hurt big time.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:58:47 +0000

I’m in favor of pursuing A-Rod, although I am soundly in the minority there.

Cabrera’s defense at 3B would go over here like a fart in church. I think we’re so used to seeing steady 3B defense from the likes of Mueller, Youkilis, and Lowell, that Cabrera’s atrocious glove would cause quite a stir in these parts.