http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/ Inside the head of a Red Sox fan Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:18:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/comment-page-1/#comment-227315 Byron Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:50:44 +0000 http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/#comment-227315 That's what I thought. That’s what I thought.

]]> http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/comment-page-1/#comment-227011 Jimmy Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:08:56 +0000 http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/#comment-227011 While he still has a ton of potential, he's not rookie eligible (the threshold is 50 MLB innings), which is the parameter I use for "prospects". If Masterson and Buchholz were still eligible, they'd be #1 and #2 on this list, respectively. While he still has a ton of potential, he’s not rookie eligible (the threshold is 50 MLB innings), which is the parameter I use for “prospects”. If Masterson and Buchholz were still eligible, they’d be #1 and #2 on this list, respectively.

]]> http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/comment-page-1/#comment-227005 Byron Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:14:06 +0000 http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2008/12/14/top-5-red-sox-pitching-prospects/#comment-227005 So you don't consider Buchholz a prospect at all? Or was this list just for players that don't have a lot of MLB time? So you don’t consider Buchholz a prospect at all? Or was this list just for players that don’t have a lot of MLB time?

]]>