<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anatomy of a LOOGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/</link>
	<description>Inside the head of a Red Sox fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fragile Freddy</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/comment-page-1/#comment-270563</link>
		<dc:creator>Fragile Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/#comment-270563</guid>
		<description>I can think of two reasons guys wouldn&#039;t get used more;

1. Once in awhile LOOGYs (LOOGIES?) will get used in a mop up role and pitch an inning in a blowout, often against non-lefties.  One inning against four righties offsets four &quot;one and done&quot; appearances.  I would bet if you could identify LI by platoon split you&#039;d find LOOGYs had a MUCH higher LI against LHB than RHB.

2. There are limited number of LHB you can use a LOOGY against.  You can use a LOOGY against Ortiz, but a guy like Kotsay will be pinch hit for so the opportunities for a true LOOGY scenario are somewhat limited.

Good stuff though.  LOOGYs are vastly overrated.  The Angels have done fine for many years without one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of two reasons guys wouldn&#8217;t get used more;</p>
<p>1. Once in awhile LOOGYs (LOOGIES?) will get used in a mop up role and pitch an inning in a blowout, often against non-lefties.  One inning against four righties offsets four &#8220;one and done&#8221; appearances.  I would bet if you could identify LI by platoon split you&#8217;d find LOOGYs had a MUCH higher LI against LHB than RHB.</p>
<p>2. There are limited number of LHB you can use a LOOGY against.  You can use a LOOGY against Ortiz, but a guy like Kotsay will be pinch hit for so the opportunities for a true LOOGY scenario are somewhat limited.</p>
<p>Good stuff though.  LOOGYs are vastly overrated.  The Angels have done fine for many years without one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/comment-page-1/#comment-270167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/03/30/the-anatomy-of-a-loogy/#comment-270167</guid>
		<description>At an early age, I remember seeing Tony Fossas on the mound and thinking to myself &quot;this man does not belong on the field&quot;.  I am glad to see that you have justified my beliefs with concrete analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At an early age, I remember seeing Tony Fossas on the mound and thinking to myself &#8220;this man does not belong on the field&#8221;.  I am glad to see that you have justified my beliefs with concrete analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

