<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Monster at Fenway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/</link>
	<description>Inside the head of a Red Sox fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/comment-page-1/#comment-296634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/?p=2907#comment-296634</guid>
		<description>Cool analysis! Let&#039;s simply wait and see for the excitement these changes would bring. Thanks. By the way, Premio Foods is one great company who has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/premiofoods?v=wall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; free goodies and recipes&lt;/a&gt; to cool sports fans out there. Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool analysis! Let&#8217;s simply wait and see for the excitement these changes would bring. Thanks. By the way, Premio Foods is one great company who has <a href="http://www.facebook.com/premiofoods?v=wall/" rel="nofollow"> free goodies and recipes</a> to cool sports fans out there. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/comment-page-1/#comment-296399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/?p=2907#comment-296399</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, the folks at FanGraphs wrote a column a few weeks ago that actually argues that not only is Cameron a better value than Bay, but he&#039;s a better player: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/bay-vs-cameron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, the folks at FanGraphs wrote a column a few weeks ago that actually argues that not only is Cameron a better value than Bay, but he&#8217;s a better player: <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/bay-vs-cameron" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/bay-vs-cameron</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/comment-page-1/#comment-296349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/?p=2907#comment-296349</guid>
		<description>Mark, I agree with your overall point that saving money (by itself) does not win games.  A team that spends $220 million will always have an inherent advantage over a team that spends $120 million.  However, when you factor in the constraint of a fixed budget, that is where cost-efficiency becomes important.  Really, there is only one &quot;Country B&quot; in the league.  The other 29 teams are &quot;Country A&quot; and try to get by on a little guile wherever they can.  

I think you nail it in your second paragraph.  Remember, the Sox still need one more corner infielder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I agree with your overall point that saving money (by itself) does not win games.  A team that spends $220 million will always have an inherent advantage over a team that spends $120 million.  However, when you factor in the constraint of a fixed budget, that is where cost-efficiency becomes important.  Really, there is only one &#8220;Country B&#8221; in the league.  The other 29 teams are &#8220;Country A&#8221; and try to get by on a little guile wherever they can.  </p>
<p>I think you nail it in your second paragraph.  Remember, the Sox still need one more corner infielder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkB</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/comment-page-1/#comment-296344</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/?p=2907#comment-296344</guid>
		<description>A well-known military analogy is in order. Country A produces weapons that are of average accuracy and average power at a very low cost - they are high-value systems. Country B produces weapons that are of high accuracy and high power at very high cost - they are very low-value systems. In a war, Country As powerful, accurate, and financially wasteful weapons destroy country B. This is a classic example of the value of output over cost-per-unit. 

Unless the Sox can take the money not paid to Jason Bay&#039;s inferior replacement, and use it to replace Lowell at third by a player who both improves on Lowell&#039;s production AND makes up for the loss in the outfield, then it&#039;s a net loss. As it is, being more cost-efficient per player alone does not help the team. If so, teams with the smallest payrolls could win the World Series each year. They can&#039;t - production wins over financial efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well-known military analogy is in order. Country A produces weapons that are of average accuracy and average power at a very low cost &#8211; they are high-value systems. Country B produces weapons that are of high accuracy and high power at very high cost &#8211; they are very low-value systems. In a war, Country As powerful, accurate, and financially wasteful weapons destroy country B. This is a classic example of the value of output over cost-per-unit. </p>
<p>Unless the Sox can take the money not paid to Jason Bay&#8217;s inferior replacement, and use it to replace Lowell at third by a player who both improves on Lowell&#8217;s production AND makes up for the loss in the outfield, then it&#8217;s a net loss. As it is, being more cost-efficient per player alone does not help the team. If so, teams with the smallest payrolls could win the World Series each year. They can&#8217;t &#8211; production wins over financial efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The House That Dewey Built » A Monster at Fenway? VX China</title>
		<link>http://www.deweyshouse.com/archives/2009/12/15/a-monster-at-fenway/comment-page-1/#comment-296342</link>
		<dc:creator>The House That Dewey Built » A Monster at Fenway? VX China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deweyshouse.com/?p=2907#comment-296342</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read the rest: The House That Dewey Built » A Monster at Fenway?          By admin &#124; category: monster &#124; tags: benefit-greatly, discussion-regarding, download-full, [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (74.220.207.122) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP () and so is spam.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read the rest: The House That Dewey Built » A Monster at Fenway?          By admin | category: monster | tags: benefit-greatly, discussion-regarding, download-full, [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (74.220.207.122) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP () and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

