Prelude to the 2010 MLB Team Previews
We’re about to hit the ground running on our annual 2010 MLB team previews, and I just wanted to give an introduction to my methodology before actually posting the previews.
My approach is similar to the same one I used last year; an attempt to isolate run scoring and run prevention via grades given to the position players, rotation, and bullpen. This year, I’ve decided to go with a numerical 1-10 projection scale, since it’s a bit more transparent than the A-F grades I gave last year. The scale works like this: based on the numerical grade I assign each player, I am projecting them to be a certain type of player in 2010.
- 10- Elite players. Only a dozen or so offensive 10′s exist, maybe five starting pitchers in all of MLB are 10′s. 10′s are typically slam dunk Hall of Famers if they remain healthy. Example: Albert Pujols.
- 9 – A great player. Players who are strong All-Star candidates, though not quite elite. Possible Hall of Famers if they are lucky enough to have a long career without too many injuries. Example: Mark Teixeira
- 8 – A very good player. Someone who might be a fringe All-Star, but they have some minor yet noticeable holes in their game that keep them out of the top categories. Example: Josh Beckett
- 7 - A good player. Definitely above average, someone who is a household name amongst casual fans, but not an All-Star. Example: Shin Soo-Choo
- 6 – An above average player. Basically, your typical starter on a bad team. Your girlfriend probably doesn’t know who he is. Example: Kevin Kouzmanoff
- 5 – An average MLB player. A great guy to have on the bench. You don’t want too many 5′s in your starting lineup, but one or two are fine stopgaps. Example: Bobby Crosby
- 4 - A below-average major leaguer. Clearly someone you do not want seeing too much playing time. A competent bench option, someone who won’t embarrass himself if called upon to fill in for injured starters. Example: Eric Hinske
- 3 - An AAAA caliber player. If he has option years left, he’ll probably be traveling quite a bit over the course of the year. Would be a regular player only on a bad team. Example: Bill Hall
- 2 – Your typical AAA caliber player. Will have great difficulty competing at the MLB level. Someone who would usually be summoned when rosters expand on September 1st. Example: Alex Cora
- 1 - A player who has no business being in the Major Leagues. He is on the roster for one of two reasons: a) the team airplane pulled a Marshall University, or b) he is the owner’s godson. Example: Nick Green
The ratings for a projected starting lineup on a fictional team would probably look something like this:
| Name | Offense | Fielding | |
| LF | Roger Waters | 8 | 7 |
| 2B | Donald Fagan | 7 | 9 |
| 1B | Neil Young | 10 | 3 |
| RF | Layne Staley | 9 | 4 |
| DH | Mark Sandman | 8 | |
| 3B | Bon Scott | 6 | 8 |
| C | David Lee Roth | 6 | |
| CF | Eric Burdon | 5 | 7 |
| SS | Walter Becker | 3 | 9 |
And the bench would also be graded:
| Name | Offense | Fielding | |
| INF | Robert Plant | 2 | 8 |
| C | Greg Allman | 5 | |
| COF | Bob Dylan | 5 | 7 |
| CF | Jack Bruce | 3 | 9 |
| 1B | Eric Clapton | 6 | 2 |
You might consider this a cop-out, but I’m refraining from grading catchers on their fielding skills. There’s just not enough data readily available, and I refuse to go by CS rates alone (since that’s such a small part of what actually happens behind the plate).
Bench scores would be weighted as 1/5 of the total offensive score.
We would then move on to the starting pitchers:
| Name | Pitching | |
| SP1 | Jimi Hendrix | 9 |
| SP2 | David Gilmour | 8 |
| SP3 | Stephen Tyler | 8 |
| SP4 | James Hetfield | 6 |
| SP5 | Lou Reed | 4 |
Of course, pitchers would only receive one grade. The final piece would be the bullpen:
| Name | Pitching | |
| MR | Mick Jagger | 4 |
| MR | Stevie Ray Vaughan | 5 |
| MR | Scott Weiland | 4 |
| MR | Phil Lynott | 7 |
| MR | Black Francis | 8 |
| CL | Jim Morrison | 9 |
To make things simple, I’m considering every non closer a middle-reliever (MR). Each team will probably have one closer (CL), unless the role is completely undecided, a la the 2003 Red Sox.
Run prevention is 50% of the team score, with the other 50% being run production. 90% of run production is pitching, with 10% being defense (the 90/10 thing is completely pulled out of my ass. I used 95/5 last year, and in retrospect, it seems like I undervalued fielding. This is all trial by error). 2/3 of pitching is determined by the starters’ score, with the remaining 1/3 coming from the bullpen.
That’s pretty much how the system works. The above team, while scoring a 9.9 in a melodiousness scale, would rate as a 6.54 on the field.
I love how you used Choo as a name that casual fans know. Hilarious.
Choo was probably the wrong guy to use there for that specific example. Maybe someone like Nick Swisher would have been a better choice. (if Shoo played for the Sox or Yanks, he’d have his own brand of salsa by now).
Nah, I like Choo. I always remember that old racist dude in Fenway laughing everytime Choo came to bat.
Oh yeah! “What is this world coming to…”. I can’t wait till I turn 80 and basically gain the ability to say anything in public without repercussions.